I am a huge Alice Hoffman fan. I love magical realism, particularly the brand of it to which she introduced me in early works such as Seventh Heaven, Turtle Moon, and (perhaps her most famous) Practical Magic. I also love her books that don’t contain that specific element but that do include a well-developed sense of whimsy, like one of my personal favorites, Second Nature. I haven’t loved all of her books unreservedly; some are too dark for me. But I’m always willing to give a book of hers a try.

I am also a huge fan of time travel stories. My absolute favorites are by Connie Willis (Doomsday Book and To Say Nothing of the Dog), but I have 25 novels on my Goodreads “time travel” list, and there are only three or four that I didn’t love. If the author takes proper account of the anomalies and forms a logical theory of the mechanics of time travel itself, I’m in. And sometimes, even if they don’t, I’m down with it if the story is sufficiently engrossing.

Finally, I seek out books about books, and this one is definitely a love letter to literature with its focus on the redeeming power of reading and specifically on the life and works of American novelist Nathaniel Hawthorne.

Given those three overwhelmingly positive statements—Hoffman fan, time travel aficionado, lover of books about reading—you would think that Hoffman’s latest book, The Invisible Hour, would be a big-time winner with me. I liked the premise: It’s about a young girl who grows up as a member of a cult in western Massachusetts. Mia is the daughter of Ivy Jacob, child of an affluent Boston family, who got pregnant as a teenager, ran away from home, and joined the Community, mostly as a result of the charismatic influence of its leader, Joel Davis, whom Ivy later marries. But Joel turns out to be a repressively controlling personality, imposing strict rules and regulations on members of the commune and forbidding them contact with the outside world. Ivy, who regrets marrying him and who loves her daughter more than anything, contrives to provide a bit of an outside life for Mia by introducing her to the library in the nearby town and abetting her in borrowing and hiding books to read. At the library, Mia discovers a first edition of The Scarlet Letter, by Nathaniel Hawthorne, and the story’s similarity to her mother’s intrigues her, as does the strange inscription in the book. Later, in an extreme moment in her life, Mia is transported back to the year 1837, where she meets the young Nathaniel Hawthorne some years before he writes what is considered to be his career masterpiece.

The first half of the book revolves around this mother-daughter relationship and explores themes such as familial love, the power of books and reading, and women’s rights, the last theme quite relevant at the current moment as we seem to be reverting in our country to the denial of female autonomy. While the story dealt with the cult years and focused on Mia and Ivy, it was compelling and immediate, containing all the beautiful prose for which I love Alice Hoffman’s books. But once Mia leaves the Community, there is a shift in the narrative so that it becomes much less richly detailed, a chronicling of events rather than an immersive, imagery-filled experience.

And then, when the time travel happens, it feels abrupt and insufficiently explained, and the narrative changes once more, becoming a dry, biographical account of the life of Nathaniel Hawthorne. While the character himself is intimately painted at his introduction and has moments of vulnerability that make him appealing, the discursive nature of the text regarding his timeline and career kept throwing me out of the story and into fact-absorbing mode, and I found it quite jarring. Additionally, the fascinating part of Alice Hoffman’s use of magical realism has always been, to me, the way she sprinkles it throughout a story, letting odd incidents pop up in the midst of an otherwise ordinary sequence of events; but in this book, there is none whatsoever in the first two-thirds of the book, and then the last third is completely focused on the magic. I can’t believe I’m saying this about a book of Hoffman’s, but it just doesn’t work.

I was sufficiently invested in Mia’s story that I was willing to go with it, so I did finish reading the book; but there was one “what the hell?” moment that set me back on my heels. I actually went to Goodreads before writing this and combed through every review on there looking for a “spoiler” entry about this anomaly and, unbelievably, absolutely no one mentioned it as a problem. I won’t say what it was, but it has to do with creating a thoroughly predictable character and then having that person act so uncharacteristically as to invalidate everything that went before. It was an awkward contrivance and frankly made me mad, given that it takes place just pages from the end.

I’m starting to feel like I should be working for Kirkus Reviews (librarians who regularly read reviews know theirs are always the most scathing), and I never intended this blog to be like that, but…do yourself a big favor and read some other Alice Hoffman books, and/or maybe go reread The Scarlet Letter, just for kicks. I won’t say you shouldn’t read this book, because for every person who dislikes it there is one or more who loves it, but that’s my opinion, for better or worse.